Al Jazeera [Arabic] is reporting over one hundred casualties in Syria today. So some people think that the "activist" groups reporting this are not credible. So let's say it was fifty Syrians killed by the regime. Is that less outrageous? What about twenty five Syrians? Would those hypocrites who pretend to be anti-imperialist be as snide and sarcastic in their comments about the daily death toll in Syria if it were Palestinians getting killed each day?
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
About Me
Maysaloon Twitter Account
More Maysaloon
My library
Labels
"Cool Arabia"
(4)
Abd al Bari Atwan
(8)
Afghanistan
(17)
Algeria
(4)
Art
(7)
Colonialism
(32)
Egypt
(29)
Ethiopia
(4)
Eurasia
(2)
Europe
(9)
Fatah
(16)
Feminism
(2)
France
(4)
Gaza
(3)
Great people
(36)
Hamas
(27)
Hezbullah
(63)
History
(12)
Hummus
(4)
Iran
(86)
Iraq
(126)
Islam
(108)
Israel
(161)
Jordan
(12)
Judaism
(2)
Kurds
(2)
Lebanon
(91)
Libya
(15)
Lina Sinjab
(8)
Mauritania
(1)
Middle East
(12)
Morroco
(5)
Music
(14)
Nakba
(3)
Orientalism
(9)
Pakistan
(16)
Palestine
(135)
Philosophy
(54)
Poetry
(37)
Quote
(4)
Ramblings
(524)
Rebels without a clue
(97)
Religion
(1)
Review
(2)
Russia
(7)
Saudi Arabia
(20)
Sleeping Arabs
(9)
Somalia
(13)
Sudan
(9)
Syria
(426)
The Arab world
(63)
Tunisia
(2)
Turkey
(16)
United Kingdom
(56)
United States
(146)
West
(18)
Wikileak
(2)
Womens rights
(9)
Yemen
(1)
Zeitouna
(3)
Zionism
(45)
أفكار
(7)
أمريكا
(1)
استعمار
(4)
اسرائيل
(6)
اسلام
(1)
الأردن
(1)
العراق
(1)
الملكية
(1)
حزب الله
(2)
حماس
(2)
سوريا
(2)
شعر
(2)
صهيونية
(4)
غزة
(4)
فلسطين
(4)
نضال
(5)
هوية
(4)
وجهة نظر
(2)
Archive
Disclaimer
This policy is valid from 05 August 2009
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.
The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.
The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.
This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.
To get your own policy, go to http://www.disclosurepolicy.org
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog does not accept any form of advertising, sponsorship, or paid insertions. We write for our own purposes. However, we may be influenced by our background, occupation, religion, political affiliation or experience.
The owner(s) of this blog will never receive compensation in any way from this blog.
The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider.
This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.
To get your own policy, go to http://www.disclosurepolicy.org
3 comments:
Al-Jazeera is a tool of such great democracy as Qatar. Its lies about Libya are too long to list. Everyone who does NOT want to Syria repeat the Libya's fate should at least take AJ reports with a healthy does of salt.
Next, what AJ reports about Palestine? WHY it so greatly cares about Syria? What about Syrian murdered by FSA (about what you have SOME reseravtions)? Are they NOT Syrians?
The same people who you call "hypocrites who pretend to be anti-imperialist" warned about AJ reports of Libya, they were ridiculed and cursed (as you do it now). One more time - do you REALLY want to Syria be "liberated" by NATO/Qatar intervention? Are you aware that FSA is NOT about some "colonel", but about NATO and GCC?
Of course, you are. You just prefer to close your eyes and repeat AJ (Qatar) lies as gospel and curse people who try to point on your willing blindness.
Of course, it does NOT mean that all is OK with Assad. But if Syria without him turned into Iraq without Saddam, would it be better? If not, why not look for ANOTHER options than NATO/GCC "liberators"?
And al Dunia TV is a paragon of journalistic excellence and reliability? Please...I'll take al Jazeera over that nonsense any day.
I am NOT saying anything about Syrian pro-government propaganda. I am NOT watching it, I get my info from other places. But at least they are payed by SYRIA, not by Qatar.
of course, your critical ability are getting nice vacation when you open the TV of Qatari king, known for gross lies about Libya, for ex.
Post a Comment